Welcome to LinuxMedNews
 up a level
 post article
 search
 admin
 Contact
 main


  Why Choose Plone over J2EE, Ruby on Rails, TurboGears, JBoss,or django?
Medical Open Source Development Posted by Ignacio H. Valdes, MD, MS on Tuesday May 23, 2006 @ 04:31 PM
from the medical-open-source-development dept.
Medical software development is very difficult to do and pushes the limits of computer science and programming. Here is a 40 minute Quicktime webcast that is an entertaining, practical side by side comparison of 6 popular development environments by a Jet Propulsion Lab engineer. The conclusion is that ZOPE-based Plone is the best for web development. Some of the metrics are: 225 minutes for a J2EE web application versus about 10 minutes for a web application in Plone that is more functional than the J2EE one. He also likes Rails and Django but the winner is Plone. The webcast is a large download. I'm seeing if it is available in slide form. Disclaimer: Linux Medical News has run ZOPE since its inception in 2000. Digg this article



<  |  >

 

  Related Links
  • Articles on Medical Open Source Development
  • Also by Ignacio H. Valdes, MD, MS
  • Contact author
  • The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
    ( Reply )

    Re: Why Choose Plone over J2EE, Ruby on Rails, Tur
    by Vincenzo Della Mea on Wednesday May 24, 2006 @ 12:45 PM
    I do not think a comparison between Plone and J2EE is fair. Plone is a CMS, J2EE is a general purpose application server. You may try to compare J2EE with Zope with some more fairness; or alternatively Plone with Lenya or Forrest (from the Apache Foundation).
    [ Reply to this ]
    Re: Why Choose Plone over J2EE, Ruby on Rails, TurboGears, JBoss,or django?
    by Alberto Odor on Wednesday May 24, 2006 @ 08:43 PM
    Anyways, the video is great and the speed and eficiency of Zope/Plone is clearly shown.
    [ Reply to this ]
    • Re: Why Choose Plone over J2EE, Ruby on Rails, Tur
      by Vincenzo Della Mea on Thursday May 25, 2006 @ 10:02 AM
      Too easy. It's like to say that with a lawnmower you can cut the grass more easily than with a 3.5hp engine and some metal still to be forged in the shape of a mower. By the way, the movie Author did not use an IDE for Java development.
      [ Reply to this ]
    Why choose Quicktime?
    by Neal McBurnett on Saturday May 27, 2006 @ 03:05 AM
    Why choose a format for your webcast that is locked up, like Quicktime and thus much harder for free software users to see?
    [ Reply to this ]
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
    ( Reply )


     
    Google
     
    www.linuxmednews.com Web
    Advertisement: CCHIT certified EMR and Medical Practice Management Software from Medical Software Associates makes patient management easy. Free practice management and medical billing software demo available.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ©2000-2006 Ignacio Valdes, MD, MS.